Silver Linings Playbook at Cardiff University SciSCREEN

Film Industry, Local

Cardiff University regularly holds sciScreen events which screen a film then features presentations and a discussion on the issues raised.  For more information on events at Cardiff University click here.

Yesterday I went to see Silver Linings Playbook, an event for Mental Health Awareness Week 2015.  This blog post will summarise some key points on the film, and also what the guest speakers had to say.

Firstly, to outline the film.  The protagonist is Pat (Bradley Cooper), who has bipolar disorder and begins the film in a mental institution because he violently attacked the man her wife was having an affair with.  He is released to the safety of his parents, on the condition that he continue psychotherapy and take his medication; several arguments occur throughout the film because Pat does not want to do either.  Pat delusionally thinks that his wife Nikki (Brea Bee) will take him back, and she is his sole motivation.  He starts helping Tiffany (Jennifer Lawrence) with a dance competition because she promises to help him get back in contact with Nikki.  Tiffany has an unspecified mental illness, but we are made aware that she took her husband’s death badly and became very sexually promiscuous.  In the end Pat realises it was Tiffany he wanted all along – happy ending.

The first speaker was Professor Nick Craddock, a psychiatrist and leader of the world’s largest bipolar study.  He began by saying that bipolar is different in every person, so no on screen depiction would ever show everything.  However he did describe the representation in Silver Linings Playbook as “reasonable”.  Craddock went on to emphasise the importance of filmic depictions of mental illness to spread awareness and foster discussion.  Key areas in the film that Craddock highlighted as being true to life were the familial struggles Pat’s mental illness brought with it, the arguments about treatment, and also the delayed diagnosis, since that is typical of real life.  Furthermore, he brought attention to Pat’s father’s (Robert De Niro) own mentally ill characteristics, such as OCD and having superstitions of “delusional intensity”. Lastly he said he enjoyed the representation of a psychiatrist having a life outside of their work, and being humanised through small things like swearing.

Next was Mark Smith, a mental health campaigner with a lived experience of bipolar disorder.  Smith drew attention to the press surrounding the film whereby the characters suffering with mental illnesses were patronisingly labelled “kooky” and as an “oddball”.  Furthermore he questioned the polished representation of mental illness with a happy ending and attractive A-list cast.  Smith specifically said there was not enough of the “dark” and “depressive” side of bipolar. He did congratulate the way the characters wear their mental illnesses on their sleeves and openly talk about it in public, such as about their medications at a dinner party.  This, he said, further encourages people in the real world to not be ashamed of their illnesses and to openly talk about them.  Mark Smith concluded by saying that research into mental illness is still seriously lacking and that events such as this are crucial in raising awareness and gaining donations.  Mark Smith runs Making Minds, an art group for people with mental illness.

Lastly was Dr. Susan Bisson, a film and media expert with an interest in mental health themes.  Her research is into how people with psychosis perceive representations of psychosis.  Bisson stated that things such as the filmmaker, budget, time period and location the film was made influence this.  But she firmly stated that there is no pattern of Hollywood = bad representation/ independent film = good representation.  Next she went on to look at how Silver Linings Playbook conformed to and departed from the norms in terms of filmic portrayals of mental illness.  The happy ending, popular theme of love conquers all, and common but unrepresentative stereotypes of violent men and hyper sexual women, show ways the film conforms to these norms.  But the absence of creative genius and more uncommon presence of self-management are departures from the conventions.  And finally she talked about how pleasure is limited for the audience, for example that awkward lift at the end of the dance.  But there are still pleasures, such as them getting the 5 they needed, or the aesthetic pleasures of the stars and cinematography.

The Imitation Game at Cardiff University sciSCREEN

Gender and Sexuality, Local

Cardiff University regularly holds sciScreen events which screen a film then features presentations and a discussion on the issues raised.  For more information on events at Cardiff University click here.

The most recent event was a screening of The Imitation Game, a film about Alan Turing, who helped end WWII by cracking the enigma machine.  This blog post will summarise some of the points made during the presentations and discussion.

Firstly was Alison Parken talking on inequality.  She highlighted how The Imitation Game tackles both homophobia and sexism through the characters of Alan and Joan, and how they are drawn together because they are both outsiders.  Furthermore, the only way for them to resolve this outsider status seems to be to normalise themselves by becoming engaged.  Sadly, Parken emphasised how little things have changed since the 1940s as there is still widespread normalised gender-bias when it comes to employment and skills.

Next, Harry Collins discussed Turing tests and imitation games.  He noted how the initial imitation games were not to detect a human (as opposed to a machine) but were based on gender (men pretending to be women and vice versa).  Collins went on to talk of more recent imitation games concerning religion, sexuality and blindness.  Apparently blind people are far better at passing as being sighted, than sighted people pretending to be blind.  Also, in terms of sexuality it is clear that in homophobic regions heterosexual men are much less likely to be able to pass as a homosexual man than in more equal countries.  Lastly, Collins threw out a controversial conspiracy theory (that apparently has some merit) that Turing was murdered, rather than committing suicide, as he was a security threat.

The third speaker was Andrew Edgar, speaking on moral philosophy and the blitz.  Edgar centred in on the point in the film where the group have cracked the code and can read the German messages, but they must keep it a secret lest the Germans find out and devise a new code.  This then seemingly shifts the moral responsibility onto Turing and co. for failing to prevent deaths, even though they did not incite them.  Finally, he talked about the tensions between rationality and emotion, and how although treating people as statistics (as in healthcare) may be a clear way to see the best course of action, it lacks emotional motivation.

Lastly was Vince Knight talking on women in mathematics.  Like Alison Parken, Knight acknowledged how little things have changed since the period the film depicts.  He announced that the first woman to win a mathematics field medal was in 2014.  However, Knight insisted that despite their lack of recognition, women have always been involved in mathematics and science.  Although Turing is often credited as being the inventor of the computer, a woman was the first to write a computer algorithm, in the 1800s.  And to end, a little trivia that the term ‘debug’ comes from literally having to remove a moth from the computer.

The next sciSCREEN event is Silver Linings Playbook.  It’s already booked up but you can put your name on the wait list so if anyone drops out you’ll be contacted to take their place.

Contagion at Cardiff University sciSCREEN

Local

Cardiff University regularly holds sciScreen events which screen a film then features presentations and a discussion on the issues raised.  For more information on events at Cardiff University click here.

For World Human Rights Week Cardiff University sciScreen showed the 2011 film Contagion and featured a discussion of relevant issues of human rights and vaccinations.  The purpose of this blog post is to summarise some of the key points made, but I am no scientist so it’ll be pretty simplistic.

Contagion is an imagining of what would happen if an epidemic broke out.  Not only does it show the health risks and efforts to combat those, but also the breakdown of society.  The speakers were keen to point out that, in Hollywood’s typical way, America comes to save the day and the process of developing a vaccination would take much longer, more people and be more costly than that displayed in the film.

Other issues raised in the film and by speakers were:
+ Should people have their freedom of expression limited if they’re spreading potentially life threatening rumours? (such as Jude Law’s character in Contagion)
+ Should people be forced to have a vaccination?
+ How did the film make you hyper-aware of what you were touching and people coughing, sneezing etc.?

Some of my own points to consider, related to the film:
+ How do ‘zombie’ films fit as a metaphor for epidemics?
+ How did Contagion use personal stories, especially children, to give the film an emotive element, rather than being purely on the science?

As you can see, not much to note on this sciSCREEN because most of the discussions were focused on science and this film blogger is out of her depth.

Dallas Buyers Club at Cardiff University sciSCREEN

Gender and Sexuality, Local

Cardiff University regularly holds sciScreen events which screen a film then features presentations and a discussion on the issues raised.  For more information on events at Cardiff University click here.

For World Aids Day sciScreen showed the recent hit, Dallas Buyers Club and featured a discussion of AIDS and HIV.  The purpose of this blog post is to summarise some of the key points made.

The plot of Dallas Buyers Club is inspired by true events and concerns Ron Woodroof finding out he has HIV and eventually AIDS, and searching for cures.  At first Ron is angry thinking that only homosexuals can get HIV, so he has a binge of sex, drugs and alcohol.  Once he comes to his senses he researches the disease and goes on to sell unapproved drugs to people with HIV.  This raises one of the biggest issues in the film, that of pharmaceutical companies ignoring research into successful treatments and instead peddling what they think will make the most money.  Ron goes on to secure unapproved drugs for personal use and lived seven years after he was diagnosed and predicted to die.

From the presentations and discussions following the film it was made abundantly clear that the issue of stigmas and taboos are central to any discourse around HIV, AIDS and other sexually transmitted diseases.  This is deeply saddening considering efforts should be going into treating the disease and making infected people as happy and comfortable as possible, without having to negotiate the added cultural shame.  This is apparent in Dallas Buyers Club where people call Ron Woodruff derogatory homophobic names, and presume that he is extremely infectious.  This is encapsulated by “faggot blood” being painted on his home.

This links to the next point where HIV is treated as a ‘special’ disease, somehow different from others.  In the UK GPs don’t have to be made aware of a patient having HIV which is apparently solely due to stigma, because why else would a patient wish to withhold health issues from their doctor.

Other information about HIV included: that we have an ageing HIV positive population; there’s a misunderstanding and improper use of the terms HIV and AIDS, which are not the same thing; HIV is frequently diagnosed ‘late’ in men, whereas antenatal screenings prevent that from being the case with women; people diagnosed with essentially ‘death sentences’ in the 1980s and 1990s who are still alive have issues such as having sold their life insurance or homes; and London is the highest infected area in the UK.

When considering the film it is important to remember that Ron Woodroof is a one off and people selling unknown or unapproved drugs are possibly selling fatal drugs.  What’s more, pharmaceutical companies are a business foremost but this doesn’t make them inherently bad.  The example shown in the film is extreme and not representative.

Laslty, sciScreen events, while providing good information on the issues within the film, tend to lack on discussion about the film form.  I’d just like to raise some points of thought on the film.  Firstly, the subjectivity given to someone infected with HIV and whether it adequately presented their symptoms – such as the white noise that appears before Ron passes out.  Next the symbolism of the rodeo.  Rodeo is thought of as an uber-masculine and heterosexual activity, Ron even says in defence of not being homosexual that he’s from the rodeo.  This serves to dispel the myth that only heterosexual men get HIV.  Furthermore there are significant connotations of ‘riding bareback’.  Additionally, Ron’s determination to last be it the eight second bet on the bull or to make it past his thirty day death sentence.

The next sciscreen event is Contagion on 8th December, and if able to attend I will post a summary.